
I refused to bow to industry pressure 30 years ago, and my reasons are as legitimate now
as they were then.

Friends,
When I was secretary of labor, America’s emerging Big Tech industry pushed to raise the cap on the number of
skilled workers allowed into the United States under the H-1B visa program.
I resisted the pressure, telling business that if they wanted skilled workers so badly, they should train Americans
for these jobs, including their own workers.
Apparently the same controversy has emerged among Trump advisers over whether and how many skilled foreign
workers should be allowed into the United States on work visas.
On the one side are billionaire techies such as Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, who sank more than a quarter
of a billion dollars into Trump’s reelection effort, and David Sachs, a venture capitalist who also poured a fortune
into Trump’s campaign.
(Trump has rewarded Musk by picking him to be co-chair of the so-called “department of government efficiency”
and rewarded Sachs by naming him czar for artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency policy.)
Both Musk and Sachs are from Big Tech and want more skilled workers from around the world.
Both built or financed businesses that rely on the government’s H-1B visa program to hire skilled workers from
abroad.
Trump’s immigration hard-liners don’t agree.
Their goal is to radically restrict immigration, deport anyone who’s undocumented, and put up high tariffs to
discourage imports from other nations (and their workers).
Which side is right?
On balance, it’s important to keep the pressure on American businesses to educate and train Americans for skilled
jobs in the United States.
Allowing many more skilled workers into the United States reduces any incentives on American business to invest in
the American workforce.
Why do so when they can get talent from abroad?
Allowing many more skilled workers into the U.S. also reduces the bargaining power of skilled workers already in
America — and thereby reduces any incentive operating on other Americans to gain the skills for such jobs.
And opening America to skilled workers also reduces the incentive on foreign nations to educate and nurture their
own skilled workforces.
Why should they, when their own skilled workers can easily migrate to America?
The major beneficiaries in the U.S. of opening the nation to skilled workers from abroad are CEOs and venture
capitalists like Musk and Sachs, whose profits and wealth would be even higher if they could siphon off cheaper
skilled workers from abroad.
What do you think?
####
…. w









warm? … is anyone warm? … ???? Oh well ….






You must be logged in to post a comment.